ArticleDrugs in context2024
Pharmacovigilance monitoring and treatment adherence in patients on antihypertensive drugs at a tertiary care centre.
Article in Drugs in context, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of adherence to sirolimus among lymphangioleiomyomatosis patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance - Technological Advancements, Recent Developments and Innovations.Current drug safety · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is one of the main factors contributing to the global burden of non-communicable diseases. Previous research has revealed that stress, bad lifestyle choices and a lack of knowledge about the disease are the main causes of hypertension that can be controlled. The key cause behind the prevalence of the condition is the lack of medication adherence by patients. This study aims to evaluate medication adherence in patients with hypertension through the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) and to observe any adverse drug reaction leading to non-adherence of medications. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 124 patients who attended the outpatient department of medicine. The descriptive tools were MMAS and causality scales for adverse drug reactions. Result: The mean MMAS score was 5.20±1.29. Amongst the demographic profile, age, sex, comorbidities and duration of disease were significantly associated with decreased mean MMAS scores. Forty-two patients experienced drug reactions and only four patients were adherent to their medications. Conclusion: Our study suggests that patients were poorly adherent to their medications. Effective interventions should be considered to improve adherence in patients. Monitoring for adverse drug reactions can lead to improved patient outcomes, whilst interventions to improve adherence can lead to better blood pressure control and reduced risk of cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.