Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468975›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2024

PREPRINT Machine Learning for the Sensitivity Analysis of a Model of the Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Cancer.

Sarah Iaquinta, Shahram Khazaie, Samer Albanna, Sylvain Fréour, Frédéric Jacquemin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah IaquintaNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, GeM, UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Shahram KhazaieNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, GeM, UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Samer AlbannaNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, GeM, UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Sylvain FréourNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, GeM, UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire, France.
Frédéric JacqueminNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, GeM, UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire, France.

Funding

i-Site NExT, Région Pays de la Loire and CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research)-ENAMEL project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental studies on the cellular uptake of nanoparticles (NPs), useful for the investigation of NP-based drug delivery systems, are often difficult to interpret due to the large number of parameters that can contribute to the phenomenon. It is therefore of great interest to identify insignificant parameters to reduce the number of variables used for the design of experiments. In this work, a model of the wrapping of elliptical NPs by the cell membrane is used to compare the influence of the aspect ratio of the NP, the membrane tension, the NP-membrane adhesion, and its variation during the interaction with the NP on the equilibrium state of the wrapping process. Several surrogate models, such as Kriging, Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE), and artificial neural networks (ANN) have been built and compared to emulate the computationally expensive model. Only the ANN-based model outperformed the other approaches by providing much better predictivity metrics and could therefore be used to compute the sensitivity indices. Our results showed that the NP's aspect ratio, the initial NP-membrane adhesion, the membrane tension, and the delay for the increase of the NP-membrane adhesion after receptor dynamics are the main contributors to the cellular internalization of the NP, while the influence of other parameters is negligible.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNanoparticlesNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerCell MembraneDrug Delivery SystemsHumansModels, Biologicaladhesioncancer cellscellular uptakemachine learningsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39468975
PMCPMC11618229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.