SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2025
Deep brain stimulation for severe dystonia associated with Wilson disease: A prospective multicenter meta-analysis of an N-of-1 trial.
Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02552628 (DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION FOR SEVERE DYSTONIA ASSOCIATED WITH WILSON'S DISEASE. A Prospective Multicenter Meta-analysis of Nof1 Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION FOR SEVERE DYSTONIA ASSOCIATED WITH WILSON'S DISEASE. A Prospective Multicenter Meta-analysis of Nof1 Trials
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep brain stimulation for severe dystonia associated with Wilson disease: A prospective multicenter meta-analysis of an N-of-1 trial.European journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeDisabling dystonia despite optimal medical treatment is common in Wilson disease (WD). No controlled study has evaluated the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on dystonia related to WD. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of DBS on dystonia related to WD.
methodsA meta-analysis of an N-of-1 prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter DBS study was conducted at two French WD reference centers. Main inclusion criteria were patients with WD, stabilized for at least 6 months with significant disability due to dystonia despite optimized medical treatment. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) was targeted for bradykinetic patients with tonic dystonia, and the internal globus pallidus (GPi) was chosen for patients with hyperkinetic dystonia. Each patient underwent two periods of DBS "on" and two periods of DBS "off," each lasting 4 months. The order of stimulation conditions was randomized. The primary outcome was the change in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Performance (COPM-P) and Satisfaction scores after each 4-month period. Secondary outcomes were changes in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) severity and disability scores and Unified Wilson's Disease Rating Scale (UWDRS) scores.
resultsBetween 12 May 2016 and 7 October 2022, three patients were included. Two patients received bilateral GPi DBS, and one received bilateral STN DBS. There was no change of COPM-P (p = 0.956), BFMDRS, and UWDRS scores. No serious adverse events were reported.
conclusionsSTN or GPi DBS are ineffective on dystonia related to WD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.