Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468765›Full record

SynthesisAnaesthesia2025

Sedation for awake tracheal intubation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Kariem El-Boghdadly, Neel Desai, Jordan B Jones, Sally Elghazali, Imran Ahmad, J Robert Sneyd

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kariem El-BoghdadlyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-717X
Neel DesaiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jordan B JonesUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sally ElghazaliDepartment of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK.
Imran AhmadDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-7040
J Robert SneydPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-9856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent sedation regimens have been used to facilitate awake tracheal intubation, but the evidence has not been synthesised robustly, particularly with respect to clinically important outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the sedation techniques most likely to be associated with successful tracheal intubation, a shorter time to successful intubation and a lower risk of arterial oxygen desaturation.

methodsWe searched for randomised controlled trials of patients undergoing awake tracheal intubation for any indication and reporting: overall tracheal intubation success rate; tracheal intubation time; incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation; and other related outcomes. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis for these outcomes if two or more sedation regimens were compared between included trials. We also performed a sensitivity analysis excluding trials with a high risk of bias.

resultsIn total, 48 studies with 2837 patients comparing 33 different regimens were included. Comparing overall awake tracheal intubation success rates (38 studies, 2139 patients), there was no evidence suggesting that any individual sedation regimen was superior. Comparing times to successful tracheal intubation (1745 patients, 24 studies), any sedation strategy was superior to placebo. When we excluded trials with a high risk of bias, we found no evidence of a difference between any interventions for time to successful tracheal intubation. Thirty-one studies (1753 patients) suggested that dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate were associated with a reduced risk of arterial oxygen desaturation compared with other interventions, but excluding trials with a high risk of bias suggested no relevant differences between interventions. The quality of evidence for each of our outcomes was low.

conclusionsTo maximise effective and safe awake tracheal intubation, optimising oxygenation, topical airway anaesthesia and procedural performance may have more impact than any given sedation regimen.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesIntubation, IntratrachealProcedural SedationHumansWakefulnessHypnotics and Sedativesairwayawake intubationdrugsnetwork meta‐analysissedation

Identifiers

PMID39468765
PMCPMC11617133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.