Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468746›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2025

Evaluation of hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure among groundskeepers in the southeastern United States.

Nathan Chen, Seunghyeon Yang, Jonghwa Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measurement of muscle passive stiffness in vibration-exposed groundskeepers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Laterality of hand-arm vibration exposure during grinding operations: a field study in industrial settings.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nathan ChenDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8524-2858
Seunghyeon YangDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-4326-8901
Jonghwa OhDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-0963

Funding

Deep South Occupational Safety & Health Education & Research Center-SupplementT42OH008436 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LUNGU, CLAUDIU T · 2005 to 2025
$28.8M
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Pilot/Small Project Research Training (PPRT) Grant through the Deep South Center for Occupational Health and Safety #T42OH008436NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to evaluate daily hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure among groundskeepers, characterize power tools used, and estimate lifetime cumulative HAV exposure dose.

methodsSeventeen groundskeepers and ten office workers employed at two US southeasterrn institutions were recruited as a target exposure group and a reference group, respectively. A 6-d exposure assessment of HAV was scheduled, and vibration dosimeters were used to obtain daily vibration exposure value, A(8). Information on power tools used and corresponding operation duration was recorded to assign the real-time vibration data collected from the dosimeters for tool characterization in terms of vibration total value (ahv) and frequency. Lifetime cumulative exposure dose, ahv-lifetime, was determined using ahv for all tools used and lifetime exposure duration obtained through a questionnaire.

resultsThe individual groundskeepers' average A(8) ranged from 0.8 to 2.6 and from 1.0 to 2.6 m/s2 for the right hand and left hands, respectively. Among 11 power tools used by the groundskeepers, grass trimmers contributed the most to the vibration exposure. The average ahv of the individual tools ranged from 8.0 (chainsaws) to 1.9 m/s2 (seating mowers and handheld blowers) for the right hand and from 6.4 (push mowers) to 1.4 m/s2 (backpack blowers) for the left hand. The highest acceleration peak of grass trimmers, edgers, backpack blowers, pole saws, riding blowers, and hedgers was observed between 100 and 200 Hz while riding mowers, seating mowers, push mowers, and chainsaws showed the highest acceleration peak at lower frequencies (≤63.5 Hz). The groundskeepers' average ahv-lifetime was 76,520.6 and 61,955.5 h m/s2 for the right and left hands, respectively. The average ahv-lifetime of office workers was 2,306.2 and 2,205.8 h m/s2 for the right and left hands, respectively, which was attributed to personal hobby activities.

conclusionThree groundskeepers' average A(8) reached 2.5 m/s2, the Action Limit recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). The highest contribution to the vibration exposure was observed during grass trimmer operations with a major acceleration peak at 100 Hz. The groundskeepers' ahv-lifetime was 33 and 28 times higher for the right and left hands, respectively, than the office workers.

Indexed as

Hand-Arm Vibration SyndromeOccupational ExposureVibrationAdultFemaleHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedSoutheastern United StatesSurveys and Questionnairesexposure measurementgroundskeepershand–arm vibrationhandheld power toolshand-transmitted vibrationHAVSsegmental vibration

Identifiers

PMID39468746
PMCPMC11979770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.