ArticleBiometrics2024
Likelihood adaptively incorporated external aggregate information with uncertainty for survival data.
Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population-based cancer registry databases are critical resources to bridge the information gap that results from a lack of sufficient statistical power from primary cohort data with small to moderate sample size. Although comprehensive data associated with tumor biomarkers often remain either unavailable or inconsistently measured in these registry databases, aggregate survival information sourced from these repositories has been well documented and publicly accessible. An appealing option is to integrate the aggregate survival information from the registry data with the primary cohort to enhance the evaluation of treatment impacts or prediction of survival outcomes across distinct tumor subtypes. Nevertheless, for rare types of cancer, even the sample sizes of cancer registries remain modest. The variability linked to the aggregated statistics could be non-negligible compared with the sample variation of the primary cohort. In response, we propose an externally informed likelihood approach, which facilitates the linkage between the primary cohort and external aggregate data, with consideration of the variation from aggregate information. We establish the asymptotic properties of the estimators and evaluate the finite sample performance via simulation studies. Through the application of our proposed method, we integrate data from the cohort of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center with aggregate survival data from the National Cancer Data Base, enabling us to appraise the effect of tri-modality treatment on survival across various tumor subtypes of IBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.