ArticleBiometrics2024
Bayesian inference for group-level cortical surface image-on-scalar regression with Gaussian process priors.
Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A NOVEL BAYESIAN FRAMEWORK UNCOVERING BRAIN CONNECTIVITY-TO-SHAPE RELATIONSHIP IN PRECLINICAL ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE.The annals of applied statistics · 2026Article
- Clarifying and extending permutation tests on brain map correspondence through mixed-effects modeling.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In regression-based analyses of group-level neuroimage data, researchers typically fit a series of marginal general linear models to image outcomes at each spatially referenced pixel. Spatial regularization of effects of interest is usually induced indirectly by applying spatial smoothing to the data during preprocessing. While this procedure often works well, the resulting inference can be poorly calibrated. Spatial modeling of effects of interest leads to more powerful analyses; however, the number of locations in a typical neuroimage can preclude standard computing methods in this setting. Here, we contribute a Bayesian spatial regression model for group-level neuroimaging analyses. We induce regularization of spatially varying regression coefficient functions through Gaussian process priors. When combined with a simple non-stationary model for the error process, our prior hierarchy can lead to more data-adaptive smoothing than standard methods. We achieve computational tractability through a Vecchia-type approximation of our prior that retains full spatial rank and can be constructed for a wide class of spatial correlation functions. We outline several ways to work with our model in practice and compare performance against standard vertex-wise analyses and several alternatives. Finally, we illustrate our methods in an analysis of cortical surface functional magnetic resonance imaging task contrast data from a large cohort of children enrolled in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.