ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
GEEES: inferring cell-specific gene-enhancer interactions from multi-modal single-cell data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting gene-specific regulation with transcriptomic and epigenetic single-cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGene-enhancer interactions are central to transcriptional regulation. Current multi-modal single-cell datasets that profile transcriptome and chromatin accessibility simultaneously in a single cell are yielding opportunities to infer gene-enhancer associations in a cell type specific manner. Computational efforts for such multi-modal single-cell datasets thus far focused on methods for identification and refinement of cell types and trajectory construction. While initial attempts for inferring gene-enhancer interactions have emerged, these have not been evaluated against benchmark datasets that materialized from bulk genomic experiments. Furthermore, existing approaches are limited to inferring gene-enhancer associations at the level of grouped cells as opposed to individual cells, thereby ignoring regulatory heterogeneity among the cells.
resultsWe present a new approach, GEEES for "Gene EnhancEr IntEractions from Multi-modal Single Cell Data," for inferring gene-enhancer associations at the single-cell level using multi-modal single-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility data. We evaluated GEEES alongside several multivariate regression-based alternatives we devised and state-of-the-art methods using a large number of benchmark datasets, providing a comprehensive assessment of current approaches. This analysis revealed significant discrepancies between gold-standard interactions and gene-enhancer associations derived from multi-modal single-cell data. Notably, incorporating gene-enhancer distance into the analysis markedly improved performance across all methods, positioning GEEES as a leading approach in this domain. While the overall improvement in performance metrics by GEEES is modest, it provides enhanced cell representation learning which can be leveraged for more effective downstream analysis. Furthermore, our review of existing experimentally driven benchmark datasets uncovers their limited concordance, underscoring the necessity for new high-throughput experiments to validate gene-enhancer interactions inferred from single-cell data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/keleslab/GEEES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.