ArticleJournal of radiation research2024
Elevated α/β ratio after hypofractionated radiotherapy correlated with DNA damage repairment in an experimental model of prostate cancer.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of In Vitro and Clinical Alpha/Beta Estimates With Potential Impact of Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A neural network embedding the linear-quadratic model for improved prediction of cellular response to ion beam exposure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Rhenium(I) Complex and Its Pyridostatin-Containing Chelator as Radiosensitizers for Chemoradiotherapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our previous study demonstrated that the linear quadratic model appeared to be not well-suited for high dose per fraction due to an observed increase in α/β ratio as the dose per fraction increased. To further validate this conclusion, we draw the cell survival curve to calculate the α/β ratio by the clone formation experiment and then convert the fractionated radiation dose into an equivalent single hypofractionated radiation dose comparing with that on the survival curve. Western Blot and laser confocal immunofluorescence were used to detect the expression of γ-H2AX and RAD51 after different fractionated modes of radiation. We constructed a murine xenograft model, and changes in transplanted tumor volume were used to evaluate the biological effects after different fractionated radiation. The results demonstrated that when fractionated radiation dose was converted into equivalent single hypofractionated radiation dose, the effectiveness of hypofractionated radiation was overestimated. If a larger α/β ratio was used, the discrepancy tended to become smaller. γ-H2AX was higher in 24 h after a single high dose radiation than the continuous expression of the DNA repair marker RAD51. This implies more irreparable damage in a single high dose radiation compared with fractionated radiation. In the murine xenograft model, the effectiveness of hypofractionated radiation was also overestimated, and additional fractions of irradiation may be required. The conclusion is that after single hypofractionated radiation, the irreparable damage in cells increased (α value increased) and some repairable sublethal damage (β value) was converted into irreparable damage (α value). When α value increased and β value decreased, the ratio increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.