Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468706›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2024

Applications of blockchain technology in long-term care: use cases, potentials, and barriers.

Beate Steurer, Birgit Trukeschitz, Ulrike Schneider

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beate SteurerResearch Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, D5, Vienna, 1020, Austria. beate.steurer@wu.ac.at.
Birgit TrukeschitzResearch Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, D5, Vienna, 1020, Austria.
Ulrike SchneiderInstitute for Social Policy, Department of Socioeconomics, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, D4, Vienna, 1020, Austria.

Funding

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft 'COMET'
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigitalization in long-term care (LTC) is being discussed as a means of easing pressures on care service delivery, optimizing care coordination and planning processes, and improving service quality. With its advanced data protection and process automation features, blockchain technology could help solve data security and privacy issues, especially for the implementation of assistive technologies. Blockchain (BC) is thus a new technology being tapped in LTC. However, little is known about the fields, scope, and experiences of BC applications in this sector.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to provide an extensive overview of current discussions of BC technology in LTC settings. Particular attention was given to the use cases, the objectives behind applying the new technology, and barriers as well as facilitating factors for the implementation.

methodAccording to the PRISMA methodology, we conducted a systematic literature review of academic articles and conference papers published between 2016 and 2023. The search through the Scopus database yielded 194 results, 29 of which were selected according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria.

resultsResearch on BC technologies has taken off in LTC since 2016. Scientific interest centers around use cases for Ambient Assisted Living (AAL), care service management, and the improved integration of care ecosystems. However, most of the selected studies discuss prototypes that have neither yet been extensively evaluated nor been implemented and tested in real-world scenarios. Among the implementation barriers, technical immaturity, stakeholder cooperation, organizational change management, access to adequate IT infrastructure and end-user acceptance issues were most evident.

conclusionFuture research is needed to gain insights into context-specific implementation efforts, user experiences, benefits, and pitfalls of using BC technologies in LTC settings. While many expectations are tied to BC applications, potential negative effects have received little attention in the literature. Whether BC technology can serve as a mitigator between privacy and security preservation and improved information sharing in LTC settings is an important topic for further research.

Indexed as

BlockchainLong-Term CareComputer SecurityHumansAALBlockchainCare ecosystemsCare service managementHealth dataLong-term carePrivacySecuritySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39468706
PMCPMC11514866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.