ArticleBMC genomics2024
Visualizing genomic evolution in Caenorhabditis through WormSynteny.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics analysis of the sodium-dependent neurotransmitter transporter family in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Chromosome-Scale Assembly of NovelmicroPublication biology · 2026Article
- Conservative evolution of genetic and genomic features inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the syntenic relationships among genomes is crucial to elucidate the genomic mechanisms that drive the evolution of species. The nematode Caenorhabditis is a good model for studying genomic evolution due to the well-established biology of Caenorhabditis elegans and the availability of > 50 genomes in the genus. However, effective alignment of more than ten species in Caenorhabditis has not been conducted before, and there is currently no tool to visualize the synteny of more than two species. In this study, we used Progressive Cactus, a recently developed multigenome aligner, to align the genomes of eleven Caenorhabditis species. Through the progressive alignment, we reconstructed nine ancestral genomes, analyzed the mutational types that cause genomic rearrangement during speciation, and found that insertion and duplication are the major driving forces for genome expansion. Dioecious species appear to expand their genomes more than androdioecious species. We then built an online interactive app called WormSynteny to visualize the syntenic relationship among the eleven species. Users can search the alignment dataset using C. elegans query sequences, construct synteny plots at different genomic scales, and use a set of options to control alignment output and plot presentation. We showcased the use of WormSynteny to visualize the syntenic conservation of one-to-one orthologues among species, tandem and dispersed gene duplication in C. elegans, and the evolution of exon and intron structures. Importantly, the integration of orthogroup information with synteny linkage in WormSynteny allows the easy visualization of conserved genomic blocks and disruptive rearrangement. In conclusion, WormSynteny provides immediate access to the syntenic relationships among the most widely used Caenorhabditis species and can facilitate numerous comparative genomics studies. This pilot study with eleven species also serves as a proof-of-concept to a more comprehensive larger-scale analysis using hundreds of nematode genomes, which is expected to reveal mechanisms that drive genomic evolution in the Nematoda phylum. Finally, the WormSynteny software provides a generalizable solution for visualizing the output of Progressive Cactus with interactive graphics, which would be useful for a broad community of genome researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.