Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468685›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2024

Time synchronisation for millisecond-precision on bio-loggers.

Timm A Wild, Georg Wilbs, Dina K N Dechmann, Jenna E Kohles, Nils Linek, Sierra Mattingly, Nina Richter, Spyros Sfenthourakis, Haris Nicolaou, Elena Erotokritou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Timm A WildDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany. twild@ab.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-2892
Georg WilbsDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
Dina K N DechmannDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0043-8267
Jenna E KohlesDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-4849
Nils LinekDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0748-4525
Sierra MattinglyDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
Nina RichterDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
Spyros SfenthourakisDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, 1678, Cyprus.
Haris NicolaouRural Development and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, 2025 Strovolos Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Elena ErotokritouRural Development and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, 2025 Strovolos Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Martin WikelskiDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-synchronised data streams from bio-loggers are becoming increasingly important for analysing and interpreting intricate animal behaviour including split-second decision making, group dynamics, and collective responses to environmental conditions. With the increased use of AI-based approaches for behaviour classification, time synchronisation between recording systems is becoming an essential challenge. Current solutions in bio-logging rely on manually removing time errors during post processing, which is complex and typically does not achieve sub-second timing accuracies.We first introduce an error model to quantify time errors, then optimise three wireless methods for automated onboard time (re)synchronisation on bio-loggers (GPS, WiFi, proximity messages). The methods can be combined as required and, when coupled with a state-of-the-art real time clock, facilitate accurate time annotations for all types of bio-logging data without need for post processing. We analyse time accuracy of our optimised methods in stationary tests and in a case study on 99 Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Based on the results, we offer recommendations for projects that require high time synchrony.During stationary tests, our low power synchronisation methods achieved median time accuracies of 2.72 / 0.43 ms (GPS / WiFi), compared to UTC time, and relative median time accuracies of 5 ms between tags (wireless proximity messages). In our case study with bats, we achieved a median relative time accuracy of 40 ms between tags throughout the entire 10-day duration of tag deployment. Using only one automated resynchronisation per day, permanent UTC time accuracies of ≤ 185 ms can be guaranteed in 95% of cases over a wide temperature range between 0 and 50 °C. Accurate timekeeping required a minimal battery capacity, operating in the nano- to microwatt range.Time measurements on bio-loggers, similar to other forms of sensor-derived data, are prone to errors and so far received little scientific attention. Our combinable methods offer a means to quantify time errors and autonomously correct them at the source (i.e., on bio-loggers). This approach facilitates sub-second comparisons of simultaneously recorded time series data across multiple individuals and off-animal devices such as cameras or weather stations. Through automated resynchronisations on bio-loggers, long-term sub-second accurate timestamps become feasible, even for life-time studies on animals. We contend that our methods have potential to greatly enhance the quality of ecological data, thereby improving scientific conclusions.

Indexed as

Animal trackingEmbedded systemsGPSInternet of animalsIoTMovement ecologyProximityReal timeTelemetryWiFiWireless sensors

Identifiers

PMID39468685
PMCPMC11520525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.