ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2024
Unsupervised machine learning identifies distinct phenotypes in cardiac complications of pediatric patients treated with anthracyclines.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic multimodal brain function monitoring enables quantitative severity grading and prognostic prediction in pediatric neurocritical care.Jornal de pediatria · 2026Article
- Data-driven endocrine-metabolic phenotypes in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome and associations with cardiometabolic risk markers.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- China-calibration-ready echocardiographic feature modeling for LVEF-derived dysfunction classification: a surrogate-label proof-of-concept.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Unsupervised clustering identifies distinct phenotypes in acute myocardial infarction: insights from the FAST-MI 2015 registry.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnthracyclines are essential in pediatric cancer treatment, but patients are at risk cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Standardized definitions by the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) aim to enhance precision in risk assessment.
objectivesCategorize distinct phenotypes among pediatric patients undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy using unsupervised machine learning.
methodsPediatric cancer patients undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy at our institution were retrospectively included. Clinical and echocardiographic data at baseline, along with follow-up data, were collected from patient records. Unsupervised machine learning was performed, involving dimensionality reduction using principal component analysis and K-means clustering to identify different phenotypic clusters. Identified phenogroups were analyzed for associations with CTRCD, defined following contemporary IC-OS definitions, and hypertensive response.
resultsA total of 187 patients (63.1% male, median age 15.5 years [10.4-18.7]) were included and received anthracycline chemotherapy with a median treatment duration of 0.66 years [0.35-1.92]. Median follow-up duration was 2.78 years [1.31-4.21]. Four phenogroups were identified with following distribution: Cluster 0 (32.6%, n = 61), Cluster 1 (13.9%, n = 26), Cluster 2 (24.6%, n = 46), and Cluster 3 (28.9%, n = 54). Cluster 0 showed the highest risk of moderate CTRCD (HR: 3.10 [95% CI: 1.18-8.16], P = 0.022) compared to other clusters. Cluster 3 demonstrated a protective effect against hypertensive response (HR: 0.30 [95% CI: 0.13- 0.67], P = 0.003) after excluding baseline hypertensive patients. Longitudinal assessments revealed differences in global longitudinal strain and systolic blood pressure among phenogroups.
conclusionsUnsupervised machine learning identified distinct phenogroups among pediatric cancer patients undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy, offering potential for personalized risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.