Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468604›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Creating a safe space: medical students' perspectives on using actor simulations for learning communication skills.

Asta Kristiina Antila, Sari Lindblom, Pekka Louhiala, Eeva Pyörälä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asta Kristiina AntilaDepartment of Public Health, Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine and Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. asta.antila@helsinki.fi.
Sari LindblomUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pekka LouhialaHealth Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, and Department of Public Health, Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, University of Helsinki, Tampere, Helsinki, Finland.
Eeva PyöräläCentre for University Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication skills are an essential part of clinical competence that need to be acquired during health professions education. Simulations are extensively used for learning communication skills and have long been integral to medical degree programmes. In this research we use qualitative methodology to explore fourth-year medical students' experiences in simulations aimed at improving versatile doctor-patient communication, focusing on their learning with trained actors.

methodsThe data comprises reflective writings from 208 fourth-year medical students, gathered after a communication skills course. These students provided informed consent for their writings to be included in the research. We performed an inductive qualitative content analysis on the textual data, with findings presented as themes, supported by categories, codes, and excerpts from raw data to enhance the trustworthiness of the analysis.

resultsWe identified eight key themes capturing students' learning experiences through simulations: practising in a safe learning environment, valuing feedback, gaining new perspectives, finding simulations valuable and enjoyable, boosting confidence and self-knowledge, and viewing simulations as authentic and engaging learning opportunities. Some students offered critical perspectives on simulations. Throughout the course, students learned diverse aspects of patient care, emotional and behavioural communication dynamics, and lessons from medical errors. Some students offered critical perspectives on simulations, and a few indicated they did not learn anything new.

conclusionsA safe learning environment is vital for encouraging learners to explore, make errors, and absorb feedback to improve their communication with patients. Students predominantly valued the communication skills training with actors and the constructive feedback received and given in the debriefing discussions. However, some students expressed critical views toward simulations. Simulations are not static; they evolve and require continual improvements. Hence, we advocate for the ongoing exploration and enhancement of communication skills learning methods, including simulations, with careful consideration for students' vulnerability and the importance of psychological safety. Additionally, it is critical to address students' perceptions that certain clinical teachers prioritise biomedical knowledge over communication skills. Providing tailored training for teachers regarding the learning methods and the desired outcomes of communication courses is essential.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePatient SimulationPhysician-Patient RelationsStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSimulation TrainingActors as patientsCommunication skills studiesContent analysisDoctor-patient communicationFeedbackMedical studentsPsychological safetySimulations, simulated patients

Identifiers

PMID39468604
PMCPMC11520799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.