ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2024
Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Anti-CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies as salvage therapy after CAR-T failure in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Short ramp-up glofitamab halves mortality risk after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy failure in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results of the LYSA BiCAR phase 2 trial with a pre-specified external control arm.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Trial
- Landmark-Based Evaluations of Long-Term Outcomes After CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Outcomes and salvage strategies for large B-cell lymphoma progressing after second-line CAR T-cell therapy: A DESCAR-T study from the LYSA group.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Article
- 6-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS6) as a prognostic factor in large B-cell lymphoma patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: A real-world multicenter study.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients with R/R LBCL treated with CD3×CD20 bispecific T-cell engagers.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Multicenter real-life evaluation of the Post-CAR prognostic index for patients with large B-cell lymphoma after CAR-T failure.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Predicting CAR-T outcomes in R/R DLBCL: a multicenter real-world study of a 5-index model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Selecting the best treatment approach and optimizing sequencing strategies in large B-cell lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Article
- Emerging Strategies of Cell and Gene Therapy Targeting Tumor Immune Microenvironment.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH (≥ 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0.05 in all comparisons). In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15.7, 7.1, 1.8 and 1.0 months, respectively (p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI. In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells. Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.