Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468585›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Pilot deployment of a machine-learning enhanced prediction of need for hemorrhage resuscitation after trauma - the ShockMatrix pilot study.

Tobias Gauss, Jean-Denis Moyer, Clelia Colas, Manuel Pichon, Nathalie Delhaye, Marie Werner, Veronique Ramonda, Theophile Sempe, Sofiane Medjkoune, Julie Josse and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tobias GaussService Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France. tgauss@chu-grenoble.fr.
Jean-Denis MoyerService Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
Clelia ColasCap Gemini Invent, Issy-Les-Moulinaux, Paris, France.
Manuel PichonService Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse III - Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Nathalie DelhayeService Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Marie WernerService d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, DMU 12 Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale Médecine Péri-Opératoire et Douleur Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Veronique RamondaPôle Anesthésie, Service de Réanimation Polyvalente URM Purpan, CHU Toulouse, Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Toulouse, France.
Theophile SempeCap Gemini Invent, Issy-Les-Moulinaux, Paris, France.
Sofiane MedjkouneCap Gemini Invent, Issy-Les-Moulinaux, Paris, France.
Julie JosseInstitut National de Recherche en Sciences Et Technologies du Numérique, Premedical Team, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Arthur JamesDMU DREAM, Service Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Anatole HarroisService d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, DMU 12 Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale Médecine Péri-Opératoire et Douleur Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Traumabase Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceDecision-making in trauma patients remains challenging and often results in deviation from guidelines. Machine-Learning (ML) enhanced decision-support could improve hemorrhage resuscitation.

aimTo develop a ML enhanced decision support tool to predict Need for Hemorrhage Resuscitation (NHR) (part I) and test the collection of the predictor variables in real time in a smartphone app (part II). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsDevelopment of a ML model from a registry to predict NHR relying exclusively on prehospital predictors. Several models and imputation techniques were tested. Assess the feasibility to collect the predictors of the model in a customized smartphone app during prealert and generate a prediction in four level-1 trauma centers to compare the predictions to the gestalt of the trauma leader. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Part 1: Model output was NHR defined by 1) at least one RBC transfusion in resuscitation, 2) transfusion ≥ 4 RBC within 6 h, 3) any hemorrhage control procedure within 6 h or 4) death from hemorrhage within 24 h. The performance metric was the F4-score and compared to reference scores (RED FLAG, ABC). In part 2, the model and clinician prediction were compared with Likelihood Ratios (LR).

resultsFrom 36,325 eligible patients in the registry (Nov 2010-May 2022), 28,614 were included in the model development (Part 1). Median age was 36 [25-52], median ISS 13 [5-22], 3249/28614 (11%) corresponded to the definition of NHR. A XGBoost model with nine prehospital variables generated the best predictive performance for NHR according to the F4-score with a score of 0.76 [0.73-0.78]. Over a 3-month period (Aug-Oct 2022), 139 of 391 eligible patients were included in part II (38.5%), 22/139 with NHR. Clinician satisfaction was high, no workflow disruption observed and LRs comparable between the model and the clinicians. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ShockMatrix pilot study developed a simple ML-enhanced NHR prediction tool demonstrating a comparable performance to clinical reference scores and clinicians. Collecting the predictor variables in real-time on prealert was feasible and caused no workflow disruption.

Indexed as

HemorrhageMachine LearningResuscitationWounds and InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsPilot ProjectsRegistriesDecision SupportMachine LearningPrediction toolShockTrauma

Identifiers

PMID39468585
PMCPMC11520814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.