ArticleBMC health services research2024
Digitalising the past decades: automated ICD-10 coding of unstructured free text dermatological diagnoses.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent digital medical databases record systematically coded diagnoses, but many legacy databases are full of hand-written, free text diagnoses, which can only be meaningfully analysed after mapping them to a coding system. While diagnoses can be extracted from full medical notes with good accuracy, no algorithm using only an unstructured free text diagnosis with no additional data has been published to date. OBJECTIVES/
methodsTherefore, we sought to create an algorithm which maps hand-written German diagnoses from our clinical photography database to ICD-10 diagnosis codes, validate its output manually by dermatologists and analyse diagnosis counts over time as a proof-of-concept of its application.
resultsOur rule-based algorithm mapped 50,884 unprocessed hand-written German free-text diagnoses covering five decades to ICD-10 codes, while reaching an accuracy of 82% against 817 dermatologist-validated diagnoses. Out of 41,021 data points with the highest algorithm confidence the top 3 identified diagnosis classes were psoriasis, eczema, and non-melanoma skin cancer. The number of ICD-10 codes belonging to chronic inflammatory diseases showed a seasonal pattern with peaks in July, and when analysed aggregated by year, peaks correlated to events such as new therapy classes for these diseases.
conclusionUsing the presented algorithm, it is possible to reliably match hand-written free text of German dermatological diagnoses to ICD-10 codes, thus enabling systematic analysis of legacy databases, making past medical knowledge accessible to today's patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.