ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024
Engaging nursing home residents in clinical research: insights from a patient advisory board, a patient advocate, and a study team.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why involvement remains fragile: a qualitative comparison of principal investigators' and patient organisations' perspectives in Italy.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient and Public Involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognized as an essential aspect of clinical research, particularly for ensuring relevancy and impact of research to those most affected. This study addresses the gap in involving older patients, particularly nursing home residents, in the research process by exploring motivations, expectations, and experiences of nursing home residents in Bremen, Germany, involved in PPI for developing a clinical trial on polypharmacy.
methodsTwo Patient Advisory Boards (PABs) were established in nursing homes as part of the INVOLVE-Clin project. A Patient Advocate (PA) facilitated communication between nursing home residents and researchers. A qualitative case study approach was employed, involving semi-structured interviews and group discussions with nursing home residents and researchers. Data was analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis.
resultsThe study found varied motivations and expectations between nursing home residents and researchers. Nursing home residents valued the social interaction and the opportunity to voice their health concerns, while researchers aimed to incorporate patients' perspectives into study design. The PA was considered crucial in facilitating communication between nursing home residents and researchers. Challenges included the complexity of the study topic and the need for methodological adjustments to suit nursing home residents´ cognitive abilities. Generally, PAB participation was experienced to provide mental stimulation and increased confidence among nursing home residents in discussing their medication management. The PAB's influence led to the decision not to conduct a polypharmacy study. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the importance of flexible approaches to PPI, particularly when involving older nursing home residents. Methodological adjustments, such as tailoring content and structure of PABs, and the inclusion of additional boards for diverse perspectives, are vital for effective involvement. The study also highlights the need for ongoing innovation in PPI methods to ensure meaningful engagement of older patients in clinical research.
conclusionThis study contributes essential insights into the practical implementation of PPI with nursing home residents, highlighting the need for patient-centric approaches that recognize their unique challenges and contributions. These findings are critical for shaping scientifically robust but also socially relevant and impactful research, especially in an aging society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.