Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468557›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2024

Health Catch-UP!: a realist evaluation of an innovative multi-disease screening and vaccination tool in UK primary care for at-risk migrant patients.

Jessica Carter, Lucy P Goldsmith, Felicity Knights, Anna Deal, Subash Jayakumar, Alison F Crawshaw, Farah Seedat, Nathaniel Aspray, Dominik Zenner, Philippa Harris and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jessica Carter *Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Lucy P Goldsmith *Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Felicity Knights *Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Anna DealMigrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Subash JayakumarThe Stonebridge Practice, Harness PCN South, NHS North West London Integrated Care System, London, UK.
Alison F CrawshawMigrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Farah SeedatThe Migrant Health Research Group, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Nathaniel AsprayThe Migrant Health Research Group, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Dominik ZennerWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Marys University of London, London, UK.
Philippa HarrisClinical Research Department, London, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Division of Infection, UCLH, London, UK.
Yusuf CiftciMigrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Fatima WurieAddiction and Inclusion Directorate, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0EU, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tess HarrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Philippa MatthewsIslington GP Federation, London, UK.
Rebecca HallGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ana Requena-MendezBarcelona Institute for Global Health (IS Global Campus Clinic), Barcelona, Spain.
Sally HargreavesThe Migrant Health Research Group, City St George's, University of London, London, UK. s.hargreaves@sgul.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigrants to the UK face disproportionate risk of infections, non-communicable diseases, and under-immunisation compounded by healthcare access barriers. Current UK migrant screening strategies are unstandardised with poor implementation and low uptake. Health Catch-UP! is a collaboratively produced digital clinical decision support system that applies current guidelines (UKHSA and NICE) to provide primary care professionals with individualised multi-disease screening (7 infectious diseases/blood-borne viruses, 3 chronic parasitic infections, 3 non-communicable disease or risk factors) and catch-up vaccination prompts for migrant patients.

methodsWe carried out a mixed-methods process evaluation of Health Catch-UP! in two urban primary healthcare practices to integrate Health Catch-UP! into the electronic health record system of primary care, using the Medical Research Council framework for complex intervention evaluation. We collected quantitative data (demographics, patients screened, disease detection and catch-up vaccination rates) and qualitative participant interviews to explore acceptability and feasibility.

resultsNinety-nine migrants were assessed by Health Catch-UP! across two sites (S1, S2). 96.0% (n = 97) had complete demographics coding with Asia 31.3% (n = 31) and Africa 25.2% (n = 25), the most common continents of birth (S1 n = 92 [48.9% female (n = 44); mean age 60.6 years (SD 14.26)]; and S2 n = 7 [85.7% male (n = 6); mean age 39.4 years (SD16.97)]. 61.6% (n = 61) of participants were eligible for screening for at least one condition and uptake of screening was high 86.9% (n = 53). Twelve new conditions were identified (12.1% of study population) including hepatitis C (n = 1), hypercholesteraemia (n = 6), pre-diabetes (n = 4), and diabetes (n = 1). Health Catch-UP! identified that 100% (n = 99) of patients had no immunisations recorded; however, subsequent catch-up vaccination uptake was poor (2.0%, n = 1). Qualitative data supported acceptability and feasibility of Health Catch-UP! from staff and patient perspectives, and recommended Health Catch-UP! integration into routine care (e.g. NHS health checks) with an implementation package including staff and patient support materials, standardised care pathways (screening and catch-up vaccination, laboratory, and management), and financial incentivisation.

conclusionsClinical Decision Support Systems like Health Catch-UP! can improve disease detection and implementation of screening guidance for migrant patients but require robust testing, resourcing, and an effective implementation package to support both patients and staff.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrimary Health CareTransients and MigrantsVaccinationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung AdultClinical decision support toolDigital solutionsInfectious diseaseMigrant healthMulti-diseaseNon-communicable diseasePrimary careScreeningVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39468557
PMCPMC11520889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.