Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468531›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after extubation: a noninferior randomized controlled trial protocol.

Xinyuan Yang, Jiangli Cheng, Zhen Wang, Meiling Dong, Zhaomin Xu, He Yu, Guopeng Liang

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinyuan Yang *Department of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jiangli Cheng *Department of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Meiling DongDepartment of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Zhaomin XuDepartment of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
He YuDepartment of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Guopeng LiangDepartment of Respiratory Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxue Alley 37#, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. liangguopeng007@163.com.

Funding

China International Medical Foundation Z-2017-24-2301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNoninvasive ventilation (NIV) is widely used for sequential extubation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, NIV may cause many adverse events such as claustrophobia, facial skin compression, air leakage, bloating, and even reflux aspiration, resulting in poor patient compliance/tolerance and high failure rate, especially for older adults who are at high risk of communication difficulties and consciousness disorder. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a new alternative support to NIV, but whether it can effectively reduce the rate of re-intubation after extubation in elderly patients with COPD remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of HFNC versus NIV for elderly COPD patients after extubation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, non-inferior, randomized controlled trial. Elderly patients (age > 65 years) who have received invasive ventilation and was diagnosed with COPD will be randomly assigned to HFNC group or NIV group immediately after extubation with a planned enrollment of 168 patients. The primary outcomes will be reintubation rates at 72 h and 7 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes will include treatment failure, post-extubation vital signs and arterial blood gases, the scores of compliance and comfort of patients, duration of respiratory support after extubation, respiratory support related adverse events, sleep quality scores, usage of sedative and analgesic drugs after extubation, and the incidence of delirium. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days post-randomization, tracheotomy rate, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2023-2284). Informed consent is required. It is expected that a follow-up randomized controlled trial will be conducted. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.

trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400087312).

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationCannulaNoninvasive VentilationOxygen Inhalation TherapyPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseElderlyHigh-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapyNoninvasive ventilationRe-intubation

Identifiers

PMID39468531
PMCPMC11520848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.