ArticleHealth services research2025
Overlapping markets and quality competition among community health centers.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turf Wars: How Growth and Competitive Shocks Have Affected the Performance and Stability of Community Health Centers.The Milbank quarterly · 2025Article
- Overlapping markets and quality competition among community health centers.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the response of community health center (CHC) quality to quality levels at neighboring CHCs in the presence of non-price competition. DATA SETTING AND
designA quasi-experimental study of US community health centers. Outcome variables were indices that measured overall quality of CHC care. Using patient flow data, we constructed CHC-specific Hirschman-Herfindahl index (HHI) and competitors' composite quality measure. The plausibly exogenous change in characteristics of "competitors' competitors" was exploited to identify the relationship between competition and quality of care, using a generalized two-stage least square model with instrumental variables. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Using the Health Center Program Uniform Data System (2014-2018), linked with American Community Survey and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we analyzed 1098 unique federally funded CHCs in 50 states and District of Columbia which had at least one neighboring CHC and had non-missing data for 2015-2018 (4226 CHC-years). PRINCIPAL
findingsMost of CHCs served populations in overlapping geographic markets, with median market concentration decreasing during the study period. A one-percent increase in competitors' quality was associated with a 0.71-percent increase in an index CHC's composite quality (p < 0.01), consisting of a 0.59-percent increase in chronic condition control rates (p < 0.01); a 0.68-percent increase in the screening and assessment rates (p < 0.01); and a 0.78-percent increase in medication management rates (p < 0.01). The association was stronger at CHCs serving a smaller proportion of uninsured patients. No significant quality reaction was observed at CHCs with a percentage of uninsured patients larger than the 75th percentile. We observed no significant associations between HHI and quality.
conclusionsIncreasing competition does not harm quality of care at CHCs. A CHC appears to improve its quality if its competitors improved quality. The beneficial quality effect was less pronounced in CHCs providing a significant proportion of care to uninsured patients, suggesting lack of incentives faced by these CHCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.