ArticleAnnals of transplantation2024
Predictive Model for Post-Transplant Renal Fibrosis Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.
Article in Annals of transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of ultrasound-based evaluation in renal transplantation.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Non-invasive assessment techniques for renal fibrosis: advances and perspectives.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using an Interpretable Model Based on Shear-Wave Elastography.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessment of renal fibrosis in post-renal transplant patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We selected 183 patients who underwent renal transplantation. The complete dataset was randomly partitioned into a training cohort (128 cases) and a validation cohort (55 cases). All patients were subjected to SWE and renal allograft biopsy. The baseline data was compared using t-test, Z-test, or chi-square test. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, we identified independent risk factors influencing renal fibrosis after transplantation, a predictive model for post-transplant renal fibrosis was developed, and calibration curves, decision curve analyses, and ROC curves were generated. RESULTS Age, TST, Scr, GFR, and Emean showed significant differences (P<0.05). The C-index of the nomogram was 0.85, and the calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test demonstrated accurate diagnosis of fibrosis in both the training and validation sets (P>0.05). DCA showed that the prediction model effectively improved the diagnostic accuracy of fibrosis. The highest AUC of the nomogram for combined prediction of renal fibrosis in transplant patients was 0.902 in the training group and 0.871 in the validation group. These values were significantly higher compared to the AUCs of individual predictors (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound SWE allows for early evaluation of renal fibrosis following transplantation. The prediction model, constructed by amalgamating other indicators, augments the accuracy and reliability of the prediction, providing more precise and accurate diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for clinical practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.