ArticleJournal of anatomy
Bone labeling experiments and intraskeletal growth patterns in captive leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius).
Article in Journal of anatomy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stochastic growth marks in Crocodylus niloticus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bone labeling experiments and intraskeletal growth patterns in captive leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius).Journal of anatomyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An understanding of the dynamics of bone growth is key to interpreting life-history parameters of vertebrates. In this study, we used fluorochrome labels in captive leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius) to track bone growth and intraskeletal variability from embryonic to adult growth stages. Thirteen individuals were administered fluorochromes from pre-hatching to 4 years of age. The left tibia, fibula, femur, humerus, radius, and ulna were examined histologically and compared for differences in the number of labels within and between individuals at each sampled growth stage, and the amount of bone growth between labels was calculated. Results suggest that limb elements had differing growth rates; the fibula grew the fastest per day on average and the femur grew the slowest per day on average. All labels administered in ovo were still present in all limb elements in adults except for the tibia, suggesting growth marks are not lost in most elements and accurate calculations of growth rates could be performed in individuals up to 3 years old. All ex ovo labels were accounted for; however, when two fluorochromes were administered 3 weeks apart, the labels could not be differentiated from each other due to the new bone not being deposited at a quantifiable level. Overall, the tibia in leopard geckos is the least reliable limb bone to use for skeletochronology and the humerus, radius, and fibula preserve the longest growth record. This research highlights that, as in other extinct and extant animals, patterns of bone growth are not consistent across reptiles. This study adds to the growing body of knowledge on growth variability in reptiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.