Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468330›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

A proteome-wide association study identifies putative causal proteins for breast cancer risk.

Tianying Zhao, Shuai Xu, Jie Ping, Guochong Jia, Yongchao Dou, Jill E Henry, Bing Zhang, Xingyi Guo, Michele L Cote, Qiuyin Cai and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tianying Zhao *Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-1867
Shuai Xu *Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jie PingDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-5819
Guochong JiaDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-1832
Yongchao DouLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jill E HenryIndiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Bing ZhangLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-2425
Xingyi GuoDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1294
Michele L CoteIndiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Qiuyin CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jirong LongDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. jirong.long@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-9766

Funding

Identification of proteins for breast cancer risk: an integrative epidemiologic and genomic studyR01CA293996 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jirong Long, Xiao-Ou Shu · 2024 to 2026
$3.6M
DNA Methylation Markers, Genes and Breast Cancer RiskR01CA247987 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LONG, JIRONG, YE, FEI · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
Integrating genomic and transcriptomic data to identify breast cancer susceptibility genesR01CA235553 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LONG, JIRONG, ZHENG, WEI · 2019 to 2024
$3.3M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) R01CA235553Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) R01CA247987NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235553NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247987NCI NIH HHS R01 CA293996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 breast cancer risk-associated genetic loci, yet the causal genes and biological mechanisms for most loci remain elusive. Proteins, as final gene products, are pivotal in cellular function. In this study, we conducted a proteome-wide association study (PWAS) to identify proteins in breast tissue related to breast cancer risk.

methodsWe profiled the proteome in fresh frozen breast tissue samples from 120 cancer-free European-ancestry women from the Susan G. Komen Tissue Bank (KTB). Protein expression levels were log2-transformed then normalized via quantile and inverse-rank transformations. GWAS data were also generated for these 120 samples. These data were used to build statistical models to predict protein expression levels via cis-genetic variants using the elastic net method. The prediction models were then applied to the GWAS summary statistics data of 133,384 breast cancer cases and 113,789 controls to assess the associations of genetically predicted protein expression levels with breast cancer risk overall and its subtypes using the S-PrediXcan method.

resultsA total of 6388 proteins were detected in the normal breast tissue samples from 120 women with a high detection false discovery rate (FDR) p value < 0.01. Among the 5820 proteins detected in more than 80% of participants, prediction models were successfully built for 2060 proteins with R > 0.1 and P < 0.05. Among these 2060 proteins, five proteins were significantly associated with overall breast cancer risk at an FDR p value < 0.1. Among these five proteins, the corresponding genes for proteins COPG1, DCTN3, and DDX6 were located at least 1 Megabase away from the GWAS-identified breast cancer risk variants. COPG1 was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer with a p value of 8.54 × 10

conclusionWe conducted the first breast-tissue-based PWAS and identified seven proteins associated with breast cancer, including five proteins not previously implicated. These findings help improve our understanding of the underlying genetic mechanism of breast cancer development.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyProteomeCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsProteome

Identifiers

PMID39468330
PMCPMC11589835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.