Observational studyScientific reports2024
Observations on relative peripheral refraction in Chinese adults with myopia based on a novel application of multispectral refraction topography.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Changes in Relative Peripheral Refraction During Childhood Myopia Onset: A 3-year Prospective Observation.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Observational
- Peripheral retinal defocus in children and adolescents with different refractive statuses and its relationship with refractive parameters.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of orthokeratology and defocus incorporated multiple segment lenses on axial length elongation in children with bilateral myopic anisometropia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this population-based observational cross-sectional study, we investigated retinal peripheral refraction in Chinese adults with myopia. We categorized 1511 Chinese adults with myopia (18 - 55 years) into low (LM), moderate (MM), and high myopia (HM) groups. Axial length, central corneal thickness, steep keratometry, flat keratometry, and intraocular pressure were measured. Refractive difference values (RDVs) for different eccentricities (RDV0-53) and the superior (RDV-S), inferior (RDV-I), temporal (RDV-T), and nasal (RDV-N) retinal regions were measured using multispectral refractive topography. The hyperopic defocus was higher for the MM group than for the LM group in RDV20-53, RDV-S, and RDV-T and HM group in RDV20-53, RDV-S, RDV-T and RDV-N. The hyperopic defocus was higher for the HM group than for the LM group in RDV20-53, RDV-S and RDV-T but lower for the LM group in RDV-N. RDV-N decreased with age (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.