ArticleScientific reports2024
Survival benefit added by adjuvant chemotherapy in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Proton Radiation in the Management of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Current Insights on Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: Related Genes and Molecular Pathways.Genes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential survival advantages associated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared to radiotherapy (RT) as standalone modalities in the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the salivary glands. Patients diagnosed with resected salivary gland ACC were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into two groups based on the type of adjuvant therapy received. The overall survival outcomes between the CRT and RT cohorts were evaluated using a multivariable Cox model. Post propensity score-matching, a total of 114 patients (57 in each treatment group) were included in the analysis. In the general patient population, CRT did not confer an additional survival benefit compared to RT alone. High-grade tumors, positive surgical margins, and the presence of five or more positive lymph nodes were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with poorer overall survival. Specifically, for patients with positive surgical margins, CRT was significantly associated with improved overall survival relative to RT, displaying a hazard ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99). Furthermore, in patients with more than four metastatic lymph nodes, CRT significantly reduced the risk of mortality by 6% (95% CI: 1-24%) when compared to RT alone. Conversely, in patients with high-grade tumors, the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to RT did not yield significant alterations in survival outcomes compared to RT alone (p = 0.437, HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.75-2.07). CRT may offer an overall survival benefit for patients with salivary gland ACC, particularly those characterized by positive margin or the presence of five or more metastatic lymph nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.