ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a gradient method for sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, isoniazid, and pyridoxine hydrochloride in rabbit plasma through QbD-driven investigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study developed a method for quantifying four drugs-Sulfamethoxazole, Trimethoprim, Isoniazid, and Pyridoxine-in rabbit plasma. The method uses gradient liquid chromatography based on analytical quality by design. To achieve separation, a Eclip Plus C18 (250 mm × 5 mm, 4.6 µm) column with L1 packing was used, and analytes were detected at 254 nm at ambient temperature. The optimized mobile phase consisted of 50 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and Methanol. The concentration of Methanol was 3% (0-5 min), 15% (5-15 min), 55% (15-27 min), and 3% Methanol until the end of the 30-min runtime, and the flow rate was set at 0.95 mL/min. Control Noise Experimentation was used to screen studies, revealing that flow rate, pH, and Methanol concentration significantly affected the analytical attributes. The study identified critical attributes (resolution and asymmetric factor) and developed a quality target method profile. A central composition design was used to optimize the essential parameters. The method developed for the drugs showed peaks at retention times of 6.990 min for Isoniazid, 7.880 min for Pyridoxine, 15.530 min for Sulfamethoxazole, and 26.890 min for Trimethoprim, respectively. The method was validated with linearity in the range of 10-640 ng ml
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.