ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Self-supervised based clustering for retinal optical coherence tomography images.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn response to the inadequacy of manual analysis in meeting the rising demand for retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, a self-supervised learning-based clustering model was implemented.
methodsA public dataset was utilized, with 83,484 OCT images with categories of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), diabetic macular edema (DME), drusen, and normal fundus. This study employed the Semantic Pseudo Labeling for Image Clustering (SPICE) framework, a self-supervised learning-based method, to cluster unlabeled OCT images into binary and four categories, and the performances were compared with baseline models. We also analysed feature distribution using t-SNE, and explored the cluster centers, attention maps, and misclassified images. In addition, DME and CNV subsets were clustered binarily, and the results were interpreted by two retinal specialists.
resultsSPICE demonstrated superior performance in binary and four categories classification tasks, achieving the accuracy of 0.886 and 0.846, respectively. In t-SNE analysis, the four types exhibited significant clustering into distinct groups. The cluster centers corresponded to the human labels, and the heat map revealed that the model focused on important biomarkers. The misclassified images exposed similar features to the inaccurate classes. The model also grouped DME and CNV into two distinct categories respectively.
conclusionsSelf-supervised clustering effectively distinguished disease variances and revealed common features, with a notable capability to detect disease heterogeneity through biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.