Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468226›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Scalable electrospinning using a desktop, high throughput, self-contained system.

Tessa S Gilmore, Pelagia-Irene Gouma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tessa S GilmoreDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 140 W 19th Ave Building 151, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. gilmore.281@buckeyemail.osu.edu.
Pelagia-Irene GoumaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 140 W 19th Ave Building 151, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospinning is a specialized processing technique for the formation of submicron diameter fibers of polymeric and ceramic materials using an electrostatic field. The process has multiple advantages over other nano- and micro- fiber synthesis methods; however, generally suffers from very low fabrication speeds, making it undesirable for scalability. This work assesses the performance of a needle-less, self-contained, high throughput electrospinning system. It further compares the fiber fabrication rates obtained versus two single needle setups with different collectors: (i) a conventional single needle and flat plate geometry, and (ii) a single needle with a rotating collector geometry. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in ethanol was used as the model material. The fabrication rate of the high throughput system "HTES" was measured at about 2.6 g/h and was about 15 times that collected of the flat plate. Comparing it to other systems reported in the literature also proved it to be a viable option for high throughput, lab scale electrospinning.

Indexed as

ElectrospinningFibersHigh-throughputMicrofibersNanofibersPolyvinylpyrrolidone

Identifiers

PMID39468226
PMCPMC11519440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.