Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468217›Full record

SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025

Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kae Jack Tay, Khi Yung Fong, Armando Stabile, Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig, Osamu Ukimura, Lara Rodriguez-Sanchez, Andreas Blana, Ezequiel Becher, M Pilar Laguna

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Pilot Study ofThe Prostate · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Focal Cryotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Does Gleason Impact Results?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kae Jack TaySingapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. kaejack.tay@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-1899
Khi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Armando StabileUnit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3700-0069
Jose Luis Dominguez-EscrigFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Osamu UkimuraKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Lara Rodriguez-SanchezUrology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-2645
Andreas BlanaKlinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany.
Ezequiel BecherCDU (Centro de Urología), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-3353-7560
M Pilar LagunaIstanbul Medipol University Medical School, Department of Urology, Medipol Mega, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

MOH | National Medical Research Council (NMRC) TA20nov-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFocal Therapy (FT) is a treatment option for the treatment of limited volume clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We aim to systematically review outcomes of established FT modalities to assess the contemporary baseline and identify gaps in evidence that will aid in further trial and study design.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all primary studies reporting outcomes of FT using cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and irreversible electroporation (IRE). We described patient inclusion criteria, selection tools, treatment parameters, and surveillance protocols, and pooled overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), biochemical progression (BP), biopsy, secondary treatment, sexual, and urinary function outcomes. Composite failure was defined as salvage whole gland ablation, radical treatment, hormonal therapy or transition to watchful waiting. SYNTHESIS: We identified 49 unique cohorts of men undergoing FT between 2008 and 2024 (21 cryotherapy, 20 HIFU, and 8 IRE). Median follow-up ranged from 6 to 63 months. Pooled OS was 98.0%, CSS 99.3%, and MFS 98.5%. Pooled BP was 9.4%/year. Biopsy was mandated post-FT within 24 months in 36/49 (73.5%) cohorts, with pooled csPCa (GG ≥ 2) rates of 22.2% overall, 8.9% infield, and 12.3% outfield. The pooled rate of secondary FT was 5.0%, radical treatment 10.5%, and composite failure 14.1%. Of 35 studies reporting sexual function, 45.7% reported a low, 48.6% moderate, and 5.7% severe impact. For 34 cohorts reporting urinary function, 97.1% reported a low impact. No differences were noted between cryotherapy, HIFU, or IRE in any of the outcomes.

conclusionFT with cryotherapy, HIFU, and IRE is associated with good short-intermediate term oncological and functional outcomes. However, outcome reporting is heterogeneous and often incomplete. Long-term follow-up and standardized reporting are required to better define and report FT outcomes.

Indexed as

CryotherapyElectroporationHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasound, High-Intensity Focused, TransrectalHumansMaleTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39468217
PMCPMC12399424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.