Trial reportScientific reports2024
Automatic setting optimization for robotic upper-extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke using ReoGo-J: a cross-sectional clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke-induced upper-extremity paralysis affects a substantial portion of the population, necessitating effective rehabilitation strategies. This study aimed to develop an automated program, incorporating the item response theory, for rehabilitation in patients with post-stroke upper-extremity paralysis, focusing on the ReoGo-J device, and to identify suitable robot parameters for robotic rehabilitation. ReoGo-J, a training device for upper-extremity disorders including 71 items, was administered to over 300 patients with varying degrees of post-stroke upper-extremity paralysis. Each item was rated on a three-point scale (0, very difficult; 1, adequate; 2, very easy). The results were analyzed using the graded response model, an extension of the two-parameter logistic model within the framework of the item response theory, to grade the training items based on ability of the patients. The relationship between the predicted ability, an indicator of the predicted ability the paralyzed upper-extremity to perform an item in the item response theory analysis (higher numbers indicate higher ability, lower numbers indicate lower ability), and the items in the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), which indicate the degree of paralysis, was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. This study included 312 patients with post-stroke upper-extremity paralysis. The predicted ability (θ) of the tasks included in the original ReoGo-J test for forward reaching, reaching for mouth, rotational reaching, radial reaching (2D), abduction reaching, reaching in eight directions, radial reach (3D), and reaching for head ranged from - 2.0 to - 0.8, - 1.3 to - 0.8, - 1.0 to - 0.1, - 0.7 to 0.3, - 0.2 to 0.4, - 0.4 to 0.6, - 0.1 to 0.6, and 0.5 to 0.6, respectively. Significantly high correlations (r = 0.80) were observed between the predicted ability of all patients and the upper-extremity items of shoulder-elbow-forearm in the FMA. We have introduced an automated program based on item response theory and determined the order of difficulty of the 71 training items in ReoGo-J. The strong correlation between the predicted ability and the shoulder-elbow-forearm items in FMA may be used to ameliorate post-stroke upper-extremity paralysis. Notably, the program allows for estimation of appropriate ReoGo-J tasks, enhancing clinical efficiency.Trial registration: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm (UMIN000040127).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.