Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468150›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Rationalised experiment design for parameter estimation with sensitivity clustering.

Harsh Chhajer, Rahul Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harsh ChhajerDepartment of Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-1855
Rahul RoyDepartment of Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India. rahulroy@iisc.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-8803

Funding

Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance IA/I/13/1/500901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative experiments are essential for investigating, uncovering, and confirming our understanding of complex systems, necessitating the use of effective and robust experimental designs. Despite generally outperforming other approaches, the broader adoption of model-based design of experiments (MBDoE) has been hindered by oversimplified assumptions and computational overhead. To address this, we present PARameter SEnsitivity Clustering (PARSEC), an MBDoE framework that identifies informative measurable combinations through parameter sensitivity (PS) clustering. We combined PARSEC with a new variant of Approximate Bayesian Computation-based parameter estimation for rapid, automated assessment and ranking of experiment designs. Using two kinetic model systems with distinct dynamical features, we show that PARSEC-based experiments improve the parameter estimation of a complex system. By its inherent formulation, PARSEC can account for experimental restrictions and parameter variability. Moreover, we demonstrate that there is a strong correlation between sample size and the optimal number of PS clusters in PARSEC, offering a novel method to determine the ideal sampling for experiments. This validates our argument for employing parameter sensitivity in experiment design and illustrates the potential to leverage both model architecture and system dynamics to effectively explore the experimental design space.

Indexed as

Approximate Bayesian computationClustering-based experiment designInformative experiment designModel fittingParameter sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID39468150
PMCPMC11519581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.