ArticleScientific reports2024
Considerations of growth factor and material use in bone tissue engineering using biodegradable scaffolds in vitro and in vivo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Sustainable Bone Grafting: Life Cycle Assessment of Donor Cadaver-Derived Allograft (BMG) Production Using a BMP-Preserving Approach.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Graphene oxide-modified PEEK composites: Properties and applications in orthopaedic repair - A review.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering aims to harness materials to develop functional bone tissue to heal 'critical-sized' bone defects. This study examined a robust, coated poly(caprolactone) trimethacrylate (PCL-TMA) 3D-printable scaffold designed to augment bone formation. Following optimisation of the coatings, three bioactive coatings were examined, i) elastin-like polypeptide (ELP), ii) poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA), fibronectin (FN) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) applied sequentially (PEA/FN/BMP-2) and iii) both ELP and PEA/FN/BMP-2 coatings applied concurrently. The scaffold material was robust and showed biodegradability. The coatings demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) osteogenic response in vitro in alkaline phosphatase gene upregulation and alkaline phosphatase production. The PCL-TMA scaffold and coatings supported angiogenesis and displayed excellent biocompatibility following evaluation on the chorioallantoic membrane assay. No significant (p < 0.05) heterotopic bone formed on the scaffolds within a murine subcutaneous implantation model, compared to the positive control of BMP-2 loaded collagen sponge following examination by micro-computed tomography or histology. The current studies demonstrate a range of innovative coated scaffold constructs with in vitro efficacy and clearly illustrate the importance of an appropriate in vivo environment to validate in vitro functionality prior to scale up and preclinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.