ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction model for survival of younger patients with breast cancer using the breast cancer public staging database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Transcriptomic Analyses Identify Four Prognosis-Associated Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A disease potential-driven graph attention model for comorbidity risk prediction of hypertension.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Survival machine learning models for predicting all-cause and case-specific mortality risk in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating Trends in Fertility Counseling among Reproductive-Age Patients with Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value and immune infiltration of novel markers TNRC6C/AMPD1 in pancreatic cancer microenvironment.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Data profile: cancer sample cohorts (stomach, breast, colorectal, and liver) in Korea.Epidemiology and health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a major contributor to female mortality worldwide, particularly in young women with aggressive tumors. Despite the need for accurate prognosis in this demographic, existing studies primarily focus on broader age groups, often using the SEER database, which has limitations in variable selection. This study aimed to develop an ML-based model to predict survival outcomes in young BC patients using the BC public staging database. A total of 3,401 patients with BC were included in the study. Patients were categorized as younger (n = 1574) and older (n = 1827). We applied several survival models-Random Survival Forest, Gradient Boosting Survival, Extra Survival Trees (EST), and penalized Cox models (Lasso and ElasticNet)-to compare mortality characteristics. The EST model outperformed others in predicting mortality for both age groups. Older patients exhibited a higher prevalence of comorbidities compared to younger patients. Tumor stage was the primary variable used to train the model for mortality prediction in both groups. COPD was a significant variable only in younger patients with BC. Other variables exhibited varying degrees of consistency in each group. These findings can help identify high-risk young female patients with BC who require aggressive treatment by predicting the risk of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.