Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468067›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Medical image segmentation with UNet-based multi-scale context fusion.

Yongqi Yuan, Yong Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Research on surgical instrument segmentation algorithm based on frequency-domain adaptive feature decomposition and visual Mamba].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongqi Yuan *School of Information Technology, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Yong Cheng *School of Information Technology, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China. chyo_200908@hotmail.com.

Funding

Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62206114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathological examination holds a crucial role in cancer grading and serves as a significant reference for devising individualized patient treatment plans in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the distinctive features of numerous histopathological image targets frequently contribute to suboptimal segmentation performance. In this paper, we propose a UNet-based multi-scale context fusion algorithm for medical image segmentation, which extracts rich contextual information by extracting semantic information at different encoding stages and assigns different weights to the semantic information at different scales through TBSFF module to improve the learning ability of the network for features. Through multi-scale context fusion and feature selection networks, richer semantic features and detailed information are extracted. The target can be more accurately segmented without significantly increasing the extra overhead. The results demonstrate that our algorithm achieves superior Dice and IoU scores with a relatively small parameter count. Specifically, on the GlaS dataset, the Dice score is 90.56, and IoU is 83.47. For the MoNuSeg dataset, the Dice score is 79.07, and IoU is 65.98.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39468067
PMCPMC11519442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.