ArticleNature communications2024
Chemoproteogenomic stratification of the missense variant cysteinome.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted proteoform degradation for precision drug design, delivery, and therapy.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- pAnno: a comprehensive, precise, and fast proteogenomic workflow for the discovery of novel coding regions.Genome biology · 2026Article
- A Proteogenomic Approach to Discover Novel lncRNA-Derived Microproteins and Their Potential Clinical Utility in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Proteoforms as the true units of physiological function.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Feedback from the Nascent Chain Triggers Ribosomal Frameshifting and Transcript Decay.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Implementing N-terminomics and machine learning to probe Nt-arginylation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- CySP3-96 Enables Scalable, Streamlined, and Low-Cost Sample Preparation for Cysteine Chemoproteomic Applications.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Article
- Prioritizing disease-associated missense variants with chemoproteomic-detected amino acids.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer genomes are rife with genetic variants; one key outcome of this variation is widespread gain-of-cysteine mutations. These acquired cysteines can be both driver mutations and sites targeted by precision therapies. However, despite their ubiquity, nearly all acquired cysteines remain unidentified via chemoproteomics; identification is a critical step to enable functional analysis, including assessment of potential druggability and susceptibility to oxidation. Here, we pair cysteine chemoproteomics-a technique that enables proteome-wide pinpointing of functional, redox sensitive, and potentially druggable residues-with genomics to reveal the hidden landscape of cysteine genetic variation. Our chemoproteogenomics platform integrates chemoproteomic, whole exome, and RNA-seq data, with a customized two-stage false discovery rate (FDR) error controlled proteomic search, which is further enhanced with a user-friendly FragPipe interface. Chemoproteogenomics analysis reveals that cysteine acquisition is a ubiquitous feature of both healthy and cancer genomes that is further elevated in the context of decreased DNA repair. Reference cysteines proximal to missense variants are also found to be pervasive, supporting heretofore untapped opportunities for variant-specific chemical probe development campaigns. As chemoproteogenomics is further distinguished by sample-matched combinatorial variant databases and is compatible with redox proteomics and small molecule screening, we expect widespread utility in guiding proteoform-specific biology and therapeutic discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.