Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468006›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2024

Proteomic profiling reveals CEACAM6 function in driving gallbladder cancer aggressiveness through integrin receptor, PRKCD and AKT/ERK signaling.

Raisatun Nisa Sugiyanto, Carmen Metzger, Aslihan Inal, Felicia Truckenmueller, Kira Gür, Eva Eiteneuer, Thorben Huth, Angelika Fraas, Ivonne Heinze, Joanna Kirkpatrick and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Raisatun Nisa SugiyantoInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carmen MetzgerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Aslihan InalInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1829-0742
Felicia TruckenmuellerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kira GürInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva EiteneuerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thorben HuthInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2791-0018
Angelika FraasInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ivonne HeinzeLeibniz Institute on Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.
Joanna KirkpatrickLeibniz Institute on Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.
Carsten StichtNGS Core Facility, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas AlbrechtInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin GoeppertInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tanja PothCenter for Model System and Comparative Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan PuschClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3407-4249
Arianeb MehrabiLiver Cancer Centre Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Junfang JiThe MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3071-6494
Alessandro OriLeibniz Institute on Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-0871
Stephanie RoesslerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Stephanie.Roessler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5333-5942

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 314905040Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 469332207Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 493697503Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid) 70113922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) presents as an aggressive malignancy with poor patient outcome. Like other epithelial cancers, the mechanisms of GBC cancer progression remain vague and efforts in finding targeted therapies fall below expectations. This study combined proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GBC samples, functional and molecular characterization of potential oncogenes and identification of potential therapeutic strategies for GBC. We identified Carcinoembryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 6 (CEACAM6) as one of the significantly most upregulated proteins in GBC. CEACAM6 overexpression has been observed in other cancer entities but the molecular function remains unclear. Our functional analyses in vitro and in vivo mouse models revealed that CEACAM6 supported the initial steps of cancer progression and metastasis by decreasing cell adhesion and promoting migration and invasion of GBC cells. Conversely, CEACAM6 knockdown abolished GBC aggressiveness by increasing cell adhesion while reducing cell migration, cell proliferation, and colony formation. BirA-BioID followed by mass-spectrometry revealed Integrin Beta-1 (ITGB1) and Protein Kinase C Delta (PRKCD) as direct molecular and functional partners of CEACAM6 supporting GBC cell migration. ERK and AKT signaling and their downstream target genes were regulated by CEACAM6 and thus the treatment with AKT inhibitor capivasertib or ERK inhibitor ulixertinib mitigated the CEACAM6-induced migration. These findings demonstrate that CEACAM6 is crucially involved in gallbladder cancer progression by promoting migration and inhibiting cell adhesion through ERK and AKT signaling providing specific options for treatment of CEACAM6-positive cancers.

Indexed as

Cell Adhesion MoleculesGallbladder NeoplasmsIntegrin beta1Protein Kinase C-deltaProtein Kinase InhibitorsAminopyridinesAnimalsAntigens, CDCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCholecystectomyDisease ProgressionFemaleGallbladderAminopyridinesAntigens, CDcapivasertibCEACAM6 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesGm5893 protein, mouseGPI-Linked ProteinsIntegrin beta1Protein Kinase C-deltaProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPyrimidinesPyrrolesulixertinib

Identifiers

PMID39468006
PMCPMC11519453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.