Not all objects are created equal: The object benefit in visual working memory is supported by greater recollection-like memory, but only for memorable objects.

Visual working memory is thought to have a fixed capacity limit. However, recent evidence suggests that a greater number of real-world objects than simple features (i.e., colors) can be maintained, an effect termed the object benefit. Here, we examined whether this object benefit in visual working memory is due to qualitatively different memory processes employed for meaningful stimuli compared to simple features. In online samples of young adults, real-world objects were better remembered than colors, had higher measures of recollection, and showed a greater proportion of high-confidence responses (Exp. 1). Objects were also remembered better than their scrambled counterparts (Exp. 2), suggesting that this benefit is related to semantic information, rather than visual complexity. Critically, the specific objects that were likely to be remembered with high confidence were highly correlated across experiments, consistent with the idea that some objects are more memorable than others. Visual working memory performance for the least-memorable objects was worse than that of colors and scrambled objects. These findings suggest that real-world objects give rise to recollective, or at least high-confidence, responses at retrieval that may depend on activation of semantic features, but that this effect is limited to certain objects.