Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467919›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2025

Differences in Religious Commitment and Harm Reduction Attitudes Among US Medical Students by Sex Assigned at Birth: A Pilot Study.

Linda S Mintle, Noor M Abdo, Philip P Nelson, Andrew Sid Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda S MintleBehavioral Sciences-Academics, Department of Behavioral Medicine, Liberty University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 306 Liberty View Lane, Lynchburg, VA, 23506, USA. lsmintle@liberty.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-4636
Noor M AbdoOMS IV, Liberty University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 306 Liberty View Lane, Lynchburg, VA, 24506, USA.
Philip P NelsonBehavioral Sciences, Oral Roberts University, 7777 S. Lewis Ave, Tulsa, OK, 74171, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9603-3777
Andrew Sid LangComputing and Mathematics Department, Oral Roberts University, 7777 S. Lewis Ave, Tulsa, OK, 74171, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-1414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harm reduction emphasizes positive change by working with individuals without judgment, coercion, discrimination, or requiring abstinence from drugs to receive support. This study examines how religious commitment and medical student attitudes toward harm reduction approaches for substance use differ based on sex assigned at birth. Participants from a US osteopathic medical school completed the revised Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale and the Belief into Action Scale. Statistical analyses revealed that males had significantly higher harm reduction acceptability scores than females. Moreover, a significant negative correlation between religious commitment and harm reduction acceptance was found, indicating that stronger religious commitment was linked to lower acceptance of harm reduction. To build on this cross-sectional exploratory study, further research is needed to delve deeper into sex differences in medical students' attitudes and the role of religious commitment in harm reduction. Future studies should explore the direction and causality of these relationships.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHarm ReductionReligion and MedicineStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSex FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultBiasHarm reductionMedical educationMedical studentsReligiositySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID39467919
PMCPMC12134044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.