SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Application of radiomics for diagnosis, subtyping, and prognostication of medulloblastomas: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor and atypical meningioma by multi-parameter MRI-based radiomics model.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Applications of radiomics for clinical management of medulloblastomas are expanding. This systematic review aims to aggregate and overview the current role of radiomics in the diagnosis, subtyping, and prognostication of medulloblastomas. The present systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE were searched using a standardized search term. Articles found within the database from the inception until November 2022 were considered for screening. Retrieved records were screened independently by two authors based on their titles and abstracts. The full text of selected articles was reviewed to finalize the eligibility. Due to the heterogeneity of included studies, no formal data synthesis was conducted. Of the 249 screened citations, 21 studies were included and analyzed. Radiomics demonstrated promising performance for discriminating medulloblastomas from other posterior fossa tumors, particularly ependymomas and pilocytic astrocytomas. It was also efficacious in determining the subtype (i.e., WNT+, SHH+, group 3, and group 4) of medulloblastomas non-invasively. Regarding prognostication, radiomics exhibited some ability to predict overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with medulloblastomas. Our systematic review revealed that radiomics represents a promising tool for diagnosis and prognostication of medulloblastomas. Further prospective research measuring the clinical value of radiomics in this setting is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39467891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.