Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467882›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2024

Exploring the Impact of Pharmacological Target-Mediated Low Plasma Exposure in Lead Compound Selection in Drug Discovery - A Modeling Approach.

Min Xu, Duxin Sun, Guohua An

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min XuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 115 S Grand Ave, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Duxin SunDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Guohua AnDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 115 S Grand Ave, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA. guohua-an@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-7663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-molecule drug development faces the challenge of low success rate. In this paper, we propose one potential cause that may occur in the preclinical phase and has rarely been brought up before - the neglected target-mediated low plasma exposure, and the subsequent lead compound mis-selection due to conventional pharmacokinetic criteria requiring sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life. To evaluate the concept of target-mediate low plasma exposure, we established a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to evaluate the concentration-time profiles of a group of virtual lead series analogs in plasma and in tissues with and without pharmacological target expression. Simulation results demonstrated that the candidate with the highest target binding has the lowest plasma exposure due to target-mediated tissue retention. The traditional PK criteria, such as the requirement of sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life, may potentially result in lead compound mis-selection by discarding the appropriate and best candidate(s). The mPBPK model was partially validated using 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on our in-house PK and tissue distribution data obtained in animals. The association rate constant (K

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryModels, BiologicalProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsComputer SimulationHalf-LifeHumansTissue DistributionProtein Kinase Inhibitorslead compound selectionminimal PBPK modelpharmacometric modelsmall-molecule drug developmenttarget-mediated low plasma exposureTMDD

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.