ArticleThe Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology2024
Predicting antioxidant activity of compounds based on chemical structure using machine learning methods.
Article in The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Roles in Development, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Machine learning insights into the antioxidant and biomolecular shielding effects of polyphenol-rich 18 date palm pit extracts.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Research progress on risk prediction models of physical restraint in the elderly: a narrative review.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxidative stress is a well-established risk factor for numerous chronic diseases, emphasizing the need for efficient identification of potent antioxidants. Conventional methods for assessing antioxidant properties are often time-consuming and resource-intensive, typically relying on laborious biochemical assays. In this study, we investigated the applicability of machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting the antioxidant activity of compounds based solely on their molecular structure. We evaluated the performance of five ML algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), using a dataset of over 1,900 compounds with experimentally determined antioxidant activity. Both RF and SVM achieved the best overall performance, exhibiting high accuracy (> 0.9) and effectively distinguishing active and inactive compounds with high structural similarity. External validation using natural product data from the BATMAN database confirmed the generalizability of the RF and SVM models. Our results suggest that ML models serve as powerful tools to expedite the discovery of novel antioxidant candidates, potentially streamlining the development of future therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.