Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467716›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology2024

Predicting antioxidant activity of compounds based on chemical structure using machine learning methods.

Jinwoo Jung, Jeon-Ok Moon, Song Ih Ahn, Haeseung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinwoo JungDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Drug Development, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.
Jeon-Ok MoonDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Drug Development, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.
Song Ih AhnSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.
Haeseung LeeDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Drug Development, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidative stress is a well-established risk factor for numerous chronic diseases, emphasizing the need for efficient identification of potent antioxidants. Conventional methods for assessing antioxidant properties are often time-consuming and resource-intensive, typically relying on laborious biochemical assays. In this study, we investigated the applicability of machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting the antioxidant activity of compounds based solely on their molecular structure. We evaluated the performance of five ML algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), using a dataset of over 1,900 compounds with experimentally determined antioxidant activity. Both RF and SVM achieved the best overall performance, exhibiting high accuracy (> 0.9) and effectively distinguishing active and inactive compounds with high structural similarity. External validation using natural product data from the BATMAN database confirmed the generalizability of the RF and SVM models. Our results suggest that ML models serve as powerful tools to expedite the discovery of novel antioxidant candidates, potentially streamlining the development of future therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningQuantitative structure-activity relationship

Identifiers

PMID39467716
PMCPMC11519722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.