ArticleGenome research2024
An optimized protocol for quality control of gene therapy vectors using nanopore direct RNA sequencing.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- When RNA goes off script: ensuring transcript fidelity in transgene expression.The EMBO journal · 2026Review
- A reference-guided iterative approach to polish the nanopore sequencing basecalling for therapeutic RNA quality control.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A direct RNA-seq-based EBV latency transcriptome offers insights into the biogenesis of EBV gene products.The Journal of general virology · 2025Article
- Article
- An optimized workflow of full-length transcriptome sequencing for accurate fusion transcript identification.RNA biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent advances made toward improving the efficacy of lentiviral gene therapies, a sizeable proportion of produced vector contains an incomplete and thus potentially nonfunctional RNA genome. This can undermine gene delivery by the lentivirus as well as increase manufacturing costs and must be improved to facilitate the widespread clinical implementation of lentiviral gene therapies. Here, we compare three long-read sequencing technologies for their ability to detect issues in vector design and determine nanopore direct RNA sequencing to be the most powerful. We show how this approach identifies and quantifies incomplete RNA caused by cryptic splicing and polyadenylation sites, including a potential cryptic polyadenylation site in the widely used Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus Posttranscriptional Regulatory Element (WPRE). Using artificial polyadenylation of the lentiviral RNA, we also identify multiple hairpin-associated truncations in the analyzed lentiviral vectors (LVs), which account for most of the detected RNA fragments. Finally, we show that these insights can be used for the optimization of LV design. In summary, nanopore direct RNA sequencing is a powerful tool for the quality control and optimization of LVs, which may help to improve lentivirus manufacturing and thus the development of higher quality lentiviral gene therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.