ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024
In toto resection of a rare intradural extramedullary cavernous malformation on the S1 nerve root: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCavernous malformations (CMs) are vascular malformations that usually occur in the brain and occasionally in the spine. Most CMs are sporadic, but they can also be caused by heterozygous cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) gene mutations. This case describes an intradural extramedullary CM in a unique location, within a fascicle of the S1 nerve root. This tumor was found to have a CCM2 mutation. An operative video demonstrates the surgical procedure used to remove this S1 intradural extramedullary CM. OBSERVATIONS: A 61-year-old male with an intradural extramedullary CM, located within a fascicle of the S1 nerve root, presented with pain and neurological symptoms. Additional imaging revealed two CCMs. The S1 CM was removed in toto. Subsequently, genetic screening revealed a CCM2 mutation. LESSONS: Given the rarity of a radicular CM, diagnosis can be challenging. CMs should be considered in patients with radicular pain and corresponding nerve root thickening. When a CM is suspected, imaging of the complete neuraxis should be performed. If multiple CMs are found, genetic screening is indicated. Complete resection of the CM yields good clinical results. The operative video in this case might help surgeons encountering this rare pathology to prepare for surgery. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24270.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.