Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467263›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025

3D Vortex-Energetics in the Left Pulmonary Artery for Differentiating Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Pulmonary Venous Hypertension Groups Using 4D Flow MRI.

Mohammed S M Elbaz, Melika Shafeghat, Benjamin H Freed, Roberto Sarnari, Zachary Zilber, Ryan Avery, Michael Markl, Bradley D Allen, James Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammed S M ElbazRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5051-5668
Melika ShafeghatRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Benjamin H FreedCardiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Roberto SarnariRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Zachary ZilberRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-0772
Ryan AveryRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael MarklRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Bradley D AllenRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0667-137X
James CarrRadiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

4D virtual Catheter (4D vCath) for multi-factorial hemodynamics in pulmonary hypertensionR01HL169780 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Mohammed Elbaz · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
Bayer Inc.NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169780NIH HHS R01HL169780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening. Differentiation pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) from pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) is important due to distinct treatment protocols. Invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) remains the reference standard but noninvasive alternatives are needed. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate 4D Flow MRI-derived 3D vortex energetics in the left pulmonary artery (LPA) for distinguishing PAH from PVH. STUDY TYPE: Prospective case-control. POPULATION/SUBJECTS: Fourteen PAH patients (11 female) and 18 PVH patients (9 female) diagnosed from RHC, 23 healthy controls (9 female). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T; gradient recalled echo 4D flow and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cardiac cine sequences. ASSESSMENT: LPA 3D vortex cores were identified using the lambda2 method. Peak vortex-contained kinetic energy (vortex-KE) and viscous energy loss (vortex-EL) were computed from 4D flow MRI. Left and right ventricular (LV, RV) stroke volume (LVSV, RVSV) and ejection fraction (LVEF, RVEF) were computed from bSSFP. In PH patients, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWR) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were determined from RHC. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U test for group comparisons, Spearman's rho for correlations, logistic regression for identifying predictors of PAH vs. PVH and develop models, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for model performance. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

resultsPAH patients showed significantly lower vortex-KE (37.14 [14.68-78.52] vs. 76.48 [51.07-120.51]) and vortex-EL (9.93 [5.69-25.70] vs. 24.22 [12.20-32.01]) than PVH patients. The combined vortex-KE and LVEF model achieved an AUC of 0.89 for differentiating PAH from PVH. Vortex-EL showed significant negative correlations with mPAP (rho = -0.43), PCWP (rho = 0.37), PVR (rho = -0.64). In the PAH group, PVR was significantly negatively correlated with LPA vortex-KE (rho = -0.73) and vortex-EL (rho = -0.71), and vortex-KE significantly correlated with RVEF (rho = 0.69), RVSV, (rho = 0.70). In the PVH group, vortex-KE (rho = 0.52), vortex-EL significantly correlated with RVSV (rho = 0.58). DATA

conclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that 4D flow MRI-derived LPA vortex energetics have potential to noninvasively differentiate PAH from PVH and correlate with invasive hemodynamic parameters. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingPulmonary Arterial HypertensionPulmonary ArteryAdultAgedCardiac CatheterizationCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies4D Flow MRIpulmonary arterial hypertensionpulmonary hypertensionpulmonary venous hypertensionvortex flow

Identifiers

PMID39467263
PMCPMC11987790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.