ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025
Survival improvement over time in renal cell carcinoma treated with nephrectomy: A longitudinal propensity score-matched study.
Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy: A Taiwan population-based study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSurgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has drastically evolved for the past 30 years. However, survival outcomes of RCC according to times have not been fully elucidated, especially in the real-world setting. This study aimed to assess the survival improvement over time in RCC treated with nephrectomy by analyzing a longitudinal cohort using propensity score matching (PSM).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 960 patients with RCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy between 1981 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the time of surgery (1981-1999 vs. 2000-2018). Using PSM, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups.
resultsOverall, 255 and 705 patients underwent surgery in the earlier (1981-1999) and recent (2000-2018) eras, and PSM derived a matched cohort of 466 patients (233 patients per each group). All patients in the earlier era cohort received open surgeries, whereas about a half (47.4%) of patients in the recent era cohort received minimally-invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) surgeries. After PSM, 137 (29.4%) patients developed recurrence, 105 (22.5%) died of RCC, and 113 (24.2%) died from other causes, with a median follow-up period of 90 months. The recent era cohort had significantly longer OS, CSS, and RFS than the earlier era cohort.
conclusionsPatients with RCC treated in the recent era (2000-2018) showed significantly longer survival than those treated in the earlier era (1981-1999). The improved survival might be attributable to the prevalence of minimally-invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.