Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467015›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2025

Comparing Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Induction Therapy for Childhood-Onset Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: An ARChiVe Registry Cohort Study.

Samuel J Gagne, Vidya Sivaraman, Else S Bosman, Brett Klamer, Kimberly A Morishita, Adam Huber, Alvaro Orjuela, Barbara Eberhard, Charlotte Myrup, Dana Gerstbacher and 18 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New avenues in childhood vasculitis.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Samuel J GagneChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-296X
Vidya SivaramanNationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Else S BosmanBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Brett KlamerThe Ohio State University School of Biomedical Science, Columbus, Ohio.
Kimberly A MorishitaBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Adam HuberIWK Health Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Alvaro OrjuelaBaylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Barbara EberhardCohen Children's Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York.
Charlotte MyrupCopenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dana GerstbacherStanford Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California.
Dirk FoellUniversity of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1946-3916
Eslam Al-AbadiBirmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Flora McErlaneGreat North Children's Hospital and Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kathryn CookAkron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio.
Linda Wagner-WeinerThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Melissa ElderUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
L Nandini MoorthyRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Paul DanceyJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Rae YeungThe Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Raju KhubchandaniSRCC Children's Hospital, Mumbai, Mumbai, India.
Samundeeswari DeepakNottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sirirat CharuvanijRiley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis.
Stacey TarvinSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Susan ShenoiMontefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-594X
Tamara TannerSiriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kelly BrownBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-3582
David A CabralBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
ARChiVe Investigators Network within the PedVas Initiative

Funding

CIHRNationwide Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGranulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are chronic life-threatening vasculitides requiring substantial immunotherapy. Adult trials identified rituximab (RTX) as an alternative to cyclophosphamide (CYC) for remission induction of GPA and MPA. Disease rarity has limited feasibility of similar trials with pediatric patients. We aim to evaluate the relative efficacy and toxicity of CYC and RTX for patients with childhood GPA and MPA through registry-based comparative evaluation.

methodsFrom A Registry of Childhood Vasculitis, we identified patients with GPA and MPA who received induction with RTX or CYC. Pediatric Vasculitis Activity Score (PVAS) and Pediatric Vasculitis Damage Index (pVDI) score evaluated disease activity and damage. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics. RTX and CYC comparisons used logistic regression for primary outcomes of postinduction remission (PVAS = 0) or low disease activity (PVAS ≤ 2). Hospital admission for adverse events and pVDI scores were compared using logistic regression and ordinal regression, respectively.

resultsAmong 104 patients, 43% received RTX, 46% CYC, 11% both. Treatment groups did not significantly differ for diagnosis PVAS and onset age. There was no difference in remission among the groups (63% overall; odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-2.52). Hospitalizations occurred in 22% of patients receiving RTX versus 10% patients receiving CYC (OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.73-7.05). The median 12-month pVDI score was 1 in both groups (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.43-2.22).

conclusionThis is the first study comparing CYC and RTX for induction in pediatric GPA and MPA. No significant differences were shown in rates of remission, severe adverse events, or organ damage. Limitations included lack of standardized treatment regimens, retrospectivity, and lack of longitudinal adverse drug-related event data.

Indexed as

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisCyclophosphamideGranulomatosis with PolyangiitisImmunosuppressive AgentsMicroscopic PolyangiitisRituximabAdolescentAge of OnsetChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleRegistriesCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID39467015
PMCPMC11931354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.