Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467007›Full record

SynthesisNursing in critical care2025

Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.

Kirsty Jane, Dean Wood, Katie Gallagher, Polly Livermore, Helen Shoemark, Glenn Robert

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07021469 (Sound Origins), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07021469 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Sound Origins: Assessment of the Acceptability and Accessibility of a Co-designed Music Therapy Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2025 to 2026Enrolled132ConditionsAccessibility and Acceptability of InterventionArmsSound origins
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neonatal Critical Care Nursing.Nursing in critical care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirsty JaneMethodologies Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Strand, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-7113
Dean WoodHoslistic Family Services, Noah's Ark Children's Hospice, Barnet, UK.
Katie GallagherEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6847-9594
Polly LivermoreOrchid Office, Level 3, Zayad Centre for Research, London, UK.
Helen ShoemarkBoyer College of Music and Dance, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-9374
Glenn RobertMethodologies Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care require support to minimize the impact on their mental health and to encourage engagement with their infants to support infant neurodevelopment. Many interventions aim to address this need, but there is a lack of research considering the accessibility of these for a multicultural population.

aimTo systematically identify sources of psychotherapeutic support available for parents with infants admitted to neonatal care (NNU, neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] and special care units), assess their accessibility and acceptability and identify challenges and facilitators. STUDY

designSix electronic databases with no restrictions on language or date were used to identify relevant studies following Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Publications were included in the review if they reviewed parent experience of an intervention actively in place to support parent experience during the neonatal unit stay. Any studies where the intervention's primary aim was infant focused, such as developmental care, were excluded. All publications were quality-assessed using quality appraisal tools appropriate for their design type. Data were extracted line by line using Sekhon et al.'s theoretical acceptability framework and questionnaire.

resultsA total of 3309 studies were found, of which 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were published worldwide between 2000 and 2023 and explored 15 different interventions. Challenges for parental engagement were due to preconceived ideas about intervention requirements and parents' ability to participate in them. Timely information and providers' experience in delivering the intervention were reported to support engagement and as being valuable for enhancing participant knowledge. The emotional content of interventions was found to be challenging by parents across most studies. This was prominent in interventions designed to be carried out in a group format and where keepsakes were created. However, the value of these interventions was in reducing parents' feelings of isolation through increased social support and providing a starting point for conversations with wider family and friends about the family's neonatal experience. Participant demographics were poorly reported, with only two studies taking into consideration the ethicality of the intervention.

conclusionPoor reporting of participant demographics, and a focus on mothers as participants, means findings are not transferrable to the wider population of parents in neonatal units. Future studies should consider how to ensure that research and interventions are accessible to multicultural populations to improve the understanding of the acceptability of interventions. Better knowledge of neonates and the NNU setting amongst intervention providers could increase the accessibility of psychotherapeutic support for parents. Training for providers on how to manage sensitive conversations may also be beneficial to support parents during interventions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The impact of neonatal admission on parental mental health is increasingly recognized and reported. Interventions have been developed to reduce the negative impact on the mental health of parents. There continue to be significant health inequalities as a result of many services not taking into account the acceptability and accessibility of interventions in this setting for their multicultural populations. This review highlights the need for better reporting of participant demographics in research and the inclusion of those seldom heard to ensure interventions are culturally, religiously and linguistically appropriate for multicultural populations.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityIntensive Care Units, NeonatalParentsPsychotherapySocial SupportHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalacceptabilitymulticulturalNICUparentspsychotherapeutic intervention

Identifiers

PMID39467007
PMCPMC12096267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.