ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
Liver Resection With Extrahepatic Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of Thoughtful Selection.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07224724 (Exosome-derived Extrahepatic Metastasis Detection By Liquid Biopsy In Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exosome-derived Extrahepatic Metastasis Detection By Liquid Biopsy In Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatectomy Plus Chemotherapy or Chemotherapy Alone for Resectable Liver and Unresectable Lung Metastases from Colorectal Adenocarcinoma (LUNA): A Randomized Phase II Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Differential prognostic impact of liver resection by the site of concurrent extrahepatic diseases in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a nationwide multicenter study (correspondence).International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe oncologic benefit of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the setting of concurrent extrahepatic disease (EHD) is controversial. We performed a population-based, cross-sectional study to determine the practice patterns and overall survival (OS) of patients with CRLM + EHD who underwent liver resection.
methodsPatients with CRLM + EHD were identified using the California Cancer Registry from 2000 to 2019. Records were linked to the Office of Statewide Health Planning Inpatient Database. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival were compared between CRLM + EHD patients with and without liver resection.
resultsOf 170 978 patients with CRLM, 62 003 (36%) had concurrent EHD (CRLM + EHD). In all, 3736 (6%) of CRLM + EHD underwent liver resection compared to 22% of patients with liver limited CRLM. Compared to CRLM + EHD without liver resection, CRLM + EHD with resection were younger, had fewer comorbidities, received higher frequencies of perioperative chemotherapy, and were more likely to have only a single site of EHD rather than multiple sites. Median OS was significantly higher for CRLM + EHD with resection compared to without (52 vs. 27 months, HR 0.46 [95% CI 0.44-0.47], p < 0.001). Regarding the location of EHD, this survival benefit was observed with liver resection for lung, peritoneal, intraabdominal lymph nodes, ovarian, and bone metastases.
conclusionsIn a large population-based setting, subsets of CRLM + EHD patients that undergo liver resection are associated with prolonged survival. These results support surgery with thoughtful patient selection to optimize survival outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.