Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466845›Full record

ArticleACS macro letters2024

Biomaterials for Cell Manufacturing.

Ryan C Miller, Johnna S Temenoff

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in ACS macro letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Rise of Mechanobiology for Advanced Cell Engineering and Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan C MillerWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech/Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Johnna S TemenoffWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech/Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3940-3574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapies, potent populations of cells used to treat disease and injury, can be strategically manufactured with biomaterial intervention to improve clinical translation. In this viewpoint, we discuss biomaterial design and integration into cell manufacturing steps to achieve three main goals: scale-up, phenotype control, and selection of potent cells. Material properties can be engineered to influence the cell-biomaterial interface and, therefore, impart desirable cell behavior such as growth, secretory activity, and differentiation. Future directions for the field should capitalize on the combinatorial design of biomaterial properties to yield highly specific and potent cell populations. Furthermore, future biomaterials could contribute to novel high-throughput cell separation technologies that can individually select the most therapeutically relevant cells within a produced batch.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationCell SeparationHumansTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID39466845
PMCPMC11580378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.